Blog

Communication Techniques for Better Conversations: Why Your Workplace Chat Game Needs an Upgrade

The email pinged at 4:47 PM last Friday, and I knew we were in trouble. "Can we circle back on this Monday? I think there might be some disconnect around the deliverables moving forward."

Twenty-three words that said absolutely nothing while somehow making everything worse. This wasn't from some graduate fresh out of uni – this came from a department head with fifteen years of experience who apparently learned to communicate by reading corporate buzzword bingo cards.

Here's what I've learned after two decades of watching workplace conversations go spectacularly sideways: most professionals think they're brilliant communicators because they can write emails without typos and speak without saying "um" too much. They're wrong. Dead wrong.

The Brutal Truth About Workplace Communication

We're drowning in words but starving for meaning. I've sat through countless meetings where everyone nodded enthusiastically while having completely different understandings of what just happened. It's like watching a room full of people speak different languages while pretending they're all fluent in English.

The average office worker sends 40 emails per day and spends 23% of their working hours in meetings. Yet 57% of employees report not being given clear directions, and 69% of managers are uncomfortable communicating with their teams. These aren't my made-up numbers – they're from actual workplace studies that should terrify anyone running a business.

But here's what really gets me fired up: we keep treating communication like it's some mystical soft skill that people either have or don't have. Like charisma or good taste in coffee. Wrong again.

What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)

Let me tell you about Sarah, a project manager at a Melbourne tech company who transformed her team's performance in six months. Not through motivation posters or team-building retreats, but by changing how they talked to each other.

Sarah instituted what she called "plain English Fridays." Every Friday, the team could only communicate using simple, direct language. No jargon, no corporate speak, no hiding behind fancy words. The first Friday was brutal – people literally didn't know how to ask for a status update without saying "circling back to gain visibility on current progress trajectories."

By month three, their project delivery time had improved by 34%. Client satisfaction scores went up. Team stress levels dropped. All because they learned to say "How's the website coming along?" instead of "I'd like to touch base regarding our digital asset development timeline."

The emotional intelligence training Sarah's team eventually took helped solidify these changes, but the foundation was simply learning to communicate like human beings.

The Five Communication Shifts That Actually Matter

1. Ditch the Buffer Language

Stop cushioning everything you say. "I was just wondering if maybe you might have a moment to possibly discuss..." No. Try: "Can we talk about the Johnson account?"

Buffer language doesn't make you polite; it makes you unclear. And unclear communication is selfish communication because it puts the burden on everyone else to figure out what you actually mean.

2. Ask Better Questions

Most workplace questions are terrible. "How are we tracking?" is not a question – it's a verbal shrug. Instead: "Will we finish the product testing by Thursday, or do we need to push the launch date?"

Specific questions get specific answers. Vague questions get vague answers, which lead to vague solutions, which lead to vague results, which lead to very specific problems later.

3. State Your Intent Upfront

Before launching into any conversation, say why you're having it. "I need to understand why the budget changed so I can update the client" hits differently than wandering around the topic for ten minutes before getting to the point.

This isn't being rude; it's being respectful of everyone's time and mental energy.

4. Disagree Better

Australian workplaces have this weird thing where we think disagreement has to be wrapped in so many apologies and qualifiers that the actual disagreement gets lost. "I'm sorry, and I might be completely wrong about this, but could it maybe be possible that perhaps we should consider..."

Just say: "I think there's a better approach." Then explain it. Adults can handle direct disagreement when it's about work, not personal attacks.

5. Listen for Understanding, Not for Your Turn to Talk

This one's harder than it sounds. Most people listen just enough to find their entry point back into the conversation. Real listening means sometimes saying, "I hadn't thought of it that way" instead of immediately explaining why your perspective is more valid.

Why This Matters More Than You Think

Poor communication doesn't just create minor inconveniences – it destroys businesses. I've watched million-dollar projects fail because nobody wanted to admit they didn't understand the requirements. I've seen talented employees quit not because of workload or pay, but because they were exhausted by trying to decode what their manager actually wanted.

The companies that get this right aren't the ones with the flashiest communication technology or the most expensive business communication training. They're the ones where people can have honest, direct conversations without walking on eggshells.

Canva, for instance, built their entire culture around clear, direct communication. They have a "no corporate speak" policy in their style guide. Not because they're anti-corporate, but because unclear communication slows everything down and frustrates everyone involved.

The Personal Cost of Poor Communication

Here's something I got completely wrong early in my career: I thought being diplomatic meant being vague. I thought good communication meant never making anyone uncomfortable.

I spent three years in a role where I basically translated between a technical team and a sales team who spoke completely different languages. Instead of teaching them to communicate directly with each other, I became this weird human buffer that made everything take twice as long.

The technical team would say things like "There are some scalability concerns with the current infrastructure implementation that may impact performance metrics under high-load scenarios." The sales team would hear "The system might be slow sometimes." Then they'd promise clients "lightning-fast performance guaranteed."

Everyone was frustrated. Projects ran late. Clients were disappointed. And it was partly my fault for enabling bad communication instead of fixing it.

Making It Practical

Start small. Pick one communication habit that annoys you when other people do it, then catch yourself doing the same thing. Maybe it's using "let's circle back" instead of setting an actual follow-up time. Maybe it's saying "we should connect soon" instead of proposing specific dates.

Track it for a week. You'll be horrified at how often you do the thing that drives you crazy when others do it.

Then practice the opposite. Instead of "I'll get back to you," try "I'll have an answer by Wednesday morning." Instead of "There might be some challenges," try "The budget's too tight for what you're asking."

The goal isn't to become blunt or rude. It's to become clear and helpful.

The Technology Trap

We keep thinking better communication tools will solve our communication problems. Slack will save us. Teams will revolutionise everything. Better video conferencing will fix remote work challenges.

Tools don't fix communication problems – they just make bad communication happen faster and to more people simultaneously.

I've seen teams have three different conversations about the same topic across email, Slack, and in-person meetings, with no one quite sure which version was the "real" decision. The problem wasn't the tools; it was the lack of clear communication protocols.

What's Really Hard About This

Changing how you communicate means changing how you think about workplace relationships. Some people resist direct communication because they think it's harsh or unprofessional. They've confused politeness with helpfulness.

Being helpful means giving people the information they need in a way they can use it. Being polite means doing it respectfully. You can be both direct and respectful – in fact, clarity is often the most respectful thing you can offer.

The hardest part is probably dealing with people who haven't made this shift yet. When you start communicating more directly, some colleagues might interpret it as rudeness or impatience. You'll need to navigate that transition period where your communication style evolves faster than the workplace culture around you.

Getting Started Tomorrow

Pick three conversations you need to have this week. Before each one, write down:

What outcome you want from the conversation
What specific information you need to share or gather
What decision needs to be made

Then have the conversation with those points as your guide, not as a script.

Notice how much shorter and more productive the conversations become when everyone knows why they're happening and what needs to be accomplished.

The best workplace conversations aren't the most eloquent or diplomatic ones. They're the ones where everyone leaves knowing exactly what they need to do next. That's a skill worth developing, and it pays dividends every single day.

Start there. Everything else is just details.